.

NEWS AND VIEWS THAT IMPACT LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT

"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Big Sis Seeks NSA-Level Spying Powers For DHS



A Bipartisan Police State
  • Democrats seek more spy power for the DHS.
  • The GOP House voted to grant private companies immunity from “any provision of the law” if they break privacy agreements and turn over your data to Big Brother.


Domestic spying capabilities used by the National Security Agency to collect massive amounts of data on American citizens could soon be available to the Department of Homeland Security — a bureaucracy with the power to arrest citizens that is not subject to limitations imposed on the NSA.

Unlike the DHS, the NSA is an intelligence agency, not a domestic law enforcement agency. It cannot arrest those suspected of wrongdoing. That power of the federal government lies with agencies under the jurisdiction of the Justice Department, the Treasury, Homeland Security and other law enforcement agencies.

The NSA and DHS have waged a long Capitol Hill turf war over cybersecurity. Bills such as the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act and the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 have sought to clearly define the relationship between the two agencies, but struggled to get off the ground reports the Daily Caller.


Judge Napolitano:  CISPA Is A Direct Assault On Privacy 




Until recently, the NSA’s military access to domestic private sector records — including personally identifiable consumer information — fueled opposition to CISPA’s passage from civil liberties advocates, the White House and Senate Democrats.

The drive for an expanded DHS role in domestic spying, however, has been picking up steam.

CISPA was reintroduced in the GOP controlled House of Representatives in February and passed in April. Although the bill stalled in the Senate, one of its most troubling portions remains intact: a provision granting private companies immunity from “any provision of the law” if they break privacy agreements between themselves and their customers to share private information with the federal government.

Michigan Republican Rep. Justin Amash opposed this provision in a debate with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers in April, but failed to earn his colleagues’ support. The provision remained intact when the House approved CISPA in April.

The DHS would receive cyber threat intelligence from other intelligence agencies — including NSA — and share it with telecom companies. In turn, telecom companies could voluntarily share aggregate threat statistics with DHS.




No comments: